I am never tremendous at the new year. Most of my life-altering behaviors occur at other times, where the pressure to change is assuaged by the monotony of daily life.
This year I was embarrassingly drunk at a NYE party where I knew very few people. I was in a city where, similarly, I knew very few people. Perhaps I should be thankful that I was not with people I have to see, i.e., the proverbial shit is far from where I eat. But in another way, it hit a little to close to home and left me convinced that change has to happen sooner rather than later.
Perhaps what will be new about this year is the embracing of New Years.
Friday, January 11, 2008
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Crap and Order
Now that Fred Thompson has abandoned fictional politics for his real world shenanigans, our hero Jack McCoy, played by Sam Waterson, finally holds the coveted position of DA on Law and Order: the Original. This should be a triumph after all he's endured. Unfortunately, McCoy's promotion is just another gratuitous nail in the coffin of one of the greatest series ever. Would they just cut to the burial, already?
Over the years, a parade of increasingly unremarkable - and occasionally ridiculous - ADAs have maintained doe-eyed confidence in the face of McCoy’s seasoned skepticism. But the show still challenged the methods and motivations of the American legal system, most frequently through the ethics-driven McCoy reporting to a (usually well-acted) constituency-beholden DA.
But with Waterson playing his own foil, the series can no longer hold. McCoy's replacement is indistinguishable from the guest stars, and the Assistant is yet another fresh faced optimist who thinks she knows the system but will inevitably become jaded through the ugliness that is public prosecution.
This is not necessarily the fault of the actors. In fact, the L&O franchise seems to employ the best in the biz (save couple of unfortunate ADAs). The fundamental problem here is the writing, which used to be cutting edge. Average cases challenged viewers' long-held attitudes about issues as polarizing as abortion and as emotional as parental rights. The famous "twists" used to indicate a shift in responsibility for what appeared to be a straightforward crime, opening a dialogue about the Constitution and human rights, market forces and free will, corporate and violent crime . Now it's just another sensational drama, and the twists are plot based with no substantive moral.
Further, it used to be equal parts law and order. Now it’s far more about the police who investigate crime than the district attorneys who prosecute the offenders. In other words, it’s just another detective show, a common whodunit.
The verdict: I watched last night's show, and I don't even remember it. Something about a "gay gene?" I didn’t think twice about the issue. Blah.
Over the years, a parade of increasingly unremarkable - and occasionally ridiculous - ADAs have maintained doe-eyed confidence in the face of McCoy’s seasoned skepticism. But the show still challenged the methods and motivations of the American legal system, most frequently through the ethics-driven McCoy reporting to a (usually well-acted) constituency-beholden DA.
But with Waterson playing his own foil, the series can no longer hold. McCoy's replacement is indistinguishable from the guest stars, and the Assistant is yet another fresh faced optimist who thinks she knows the system but will inevitably become jaded through the ugliness that is public prosecution.
This is not necessarily the fault of the actors. In fact, the L&O franchise seems to employ the best in the biz (save couple of unfortunate ADAs). The fundamental problem here is the writing, which used to be cutting edge. Average cases challenged viewers' long-held attitudes about issues as polarizing as abortion and as emotional as parental rights. The famous "twists" used to indicate a shift in responsibility for what appeared to be a straightforward crime, opening a dialogue about the Constitution and human rights, market forces and free will, corporate and violent crime . Now it's just another sensational drama, and the twists are plot based with no substantive moral.
Further, it used to be equal parts law and order. Now it’s far more about the police who investigate crime than the district attorneys who prosecute the offenders. In other words, it’s just another detective show, a common whodunit.
The verdict: I watched last night's show, and I don't even remember it. Something about a "gay gene?" I didn’t think twice about the issue. Blah.
Wednesday, January 9, 2008
So let me explain...
This is a personal endeavor employing public space.
I need a creative outlet. As the guitar I have sounds terrible (it's not just me), and I have yet to take up knitting, I decided to focus on what I know/do best: watch and listen to stuff.
I'm a podcast addict, and I watch way more than my fair share of TV, DVDs, and online content, not to mention my extensive social networking. And as I'm so reserved in my daily life, this will be the place for me to air my thoughts about something I've heard, seen, or even read...but more likely heard or seen.
I've decided against rules for the blog, as I don't deal well with restrictions. But I'll generally try to keep entries pithy. I will also try to post 3 times a week. (Now that I've made this commitment in writing, I'm more likely to follow-through, right? I'm waiting for the cognitive dissonance to kick in)
Mind you, this is not the first time I've tried this. But I think the solid concept may serve me better. Jebus, grant me follow-through!
I need a creative outlet. As the guitar I have sounds terrible (it's not just me), and I have yet to take up knitting, I decided to focus on what I know/do best: watch and listen to stuff.
I'm a podcast addict, and I watch way more than my fair share of TV, DVDs, and online content, not to mention my extensive social networking. And as I'm so reserved in my daily life, this will be the place for me to air my thoughts about something I've heard, seen, or even read...but more likely heard or seen.
I've decided against rules for the blog, as I don't deal well with restrictions. But I'll generally try to keep entries pithy. I will also try to post 3 times a week. (Now that I've made this commitment in writing, I'm more likely to follow-through, right? I'm waiting for the cognitive dissonance to kick in)
Mind you, this is not the first time I've tried this. But I think the solid concept may serve me better. Jebus, grant me follow-through!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)